Voice swatches

four surfaces · three voices each · one boundary sample · pick per-surface or one voice for everything · nothing here is applied yet

The voices: A · terminal — git-speak, imperative, how-to; explanation only where the hand needs it. B · field note — observed facts in reading order; no imperatives, no lessons. C · ledger — the current cadence kept, cut roughly in half; one qualification maximum. D · boundary — past the line on purpose, to locate it.

1 · the door — cruxia hero

cruxia.ai, first screen. Competing with porn: one claim, then out of the way.

CURRENT

Software has started to act on beliefs. We build instruments for keeping the books.

The problem is large; our instruments are small and checkable — every claim they make recomputes on your machine.

31 words after the h1's 15. Two clauses, two em-dash beats.

A · TERMINAL

Software has started to act on beliefs.

We keep the books. Everything recomputes on your machine.

uvx sagrada-linter read .

9 words + the command. The how-to IS the subline.

B · FIELD NOTE

Software has started to act on beliefs.

Nothing records what an agent believed, or when that changed. We started keeping books.

14 words. States the gap as a fact, not a mission.

C · LEDGER

Software has started to act on beliefs. We build instruments for keeping the books.

Small instruments, checkable claims. Everything recomputes on your machine.

9 words. Keeps the full h1 and the cadence; drops "the problem is large" — the reader decides how large.

2 · the Examen — /demo

the first instrument section. Your example lives here.

CURRENT

the Examen — the first reading

One command: an examination of conscience for a repository. It reads your repo's own git history — which rules were born, which were deliberately killed, which are active again today. Nothing leaves the machine. Or start with the specimen — scripted history, known findings.

44 words before the command appears.

A · TERMINAL

Examen your own repo

uvx sagrada-linter read .

Reads your git history: which rules were born, which were killed, which are back. Nothing leaves the machine.

First time? The specimen — scripted history, known findings.

Command first, explanation after. "Examen" used as a verb, unexplained — the run teaches it.

B · FIELD NOTE

the Examen

An examination of conscience, for a repository. One command, your own history, nothing sent anywhere.

uvx sagrada-linter read .

The one poetry beat ("examination of conscience") carries the whole section; the rest is inventory.

C · LEDGER

the Examen — the first reading

One command reads your repo's own history: born, killed, walking again. Nothing leaves the machine.

uvx sagrada-linter read .

15 words. The born/killed/walking triple stays; "deliberately" and the second sentence go.

3 · the Graveyard — subline

the dark page. The no-server claim currently appears three times on this page; every swatch says it once.

CURRENT

the Graveyard

Every repository already has one: the rules it retracted, lying in its own git history. Nothing is sent here — there is no here. Your browser reads the stones itself: which rules rest, which were restored with paperwork, which walk.

39 words, three images (stones, paperwork, walking) plus the epigram.

A · TERMINAL

the Graveyard

Every repo already has one. Your browser reads it straight from the GitHub API — no server, nothing sent.

18 words. Mechanism over image.

B · FIELD NOTE

the Graveyard

Every repository already has one: the rules it retracted, still lying in its git history. Your browser reads the stones itself.

21 words, one image. The rest of the page shows rest/restored/walking — no need to preannounce them.

C · LEDGER

the Graveyard

Every repository already has one. Your browser reads the stones itself — there is no here.

15 words. Keeps the best line and stops. Space for thought: the reader completes the image.

4 · the Index — landing definition

beliefrotindex.com, above the census box.

CURRENT

A weekly census of zombie beliefs in public rule files.

How long does a retracted rule survive unnoticed? We started counting.

A zombie belief is a rule your team retracted — on the record, in your own git history — that later crept back into the file your agent reads. The agent sees only today's text; it cannot see the retraction. This index keeps the record.

The definition paragraph is a lesson (44 words) between the reader and the number.

A · TERMINAL

A weekly census of zombie beliefs in public rule files.

How long does a retracted rule survive unnoticed? We started counting.

Definition deleted; "zombie belief" links to the Method for whoever wants school. The number is the next thing they see.

B · FIELD NOTE

A weekly census of zombie beliefs in public rule files.

A zombie belief: a rule you retracted that crept back into the file your agent reads.

One-sentence definition, colon not lecture. The counting line moves below the number.

C · LEDGER

A weekly census of zombie beliefs in public rule files.

How long does a retracted rule survive unnoticed? We started counting.

A zombie belief is a rule you retracted that crept back into the file your agent reads. The agent sees only today's text.

Definition halved; "this index keeps the record" cut — the page IS the record, no need to say so.

5 · the boundary sample

past the line on purpose — so we know where the line is.

D · BOUNDARY (the door, near-silent)

Software has started to act on beliefs.

uvx sagrada-linter read .

Nothing else above the fold. Confident to the point of arrogance; loses the descriptive load you said to keep. Shown to locate the ceiling, not to ship.

D · BOUNDARY (editorial deleted)

38 scored · 27 clear · 7 walking

read it plainly — These are among the best-maintained repositories in the world, and roughly one in seven carries a rule its own maintainers killed on purpose. Discipline alone does not keep books.

The "read it plainly" box, struck. The Lacanian case: the number sits alone and the reader does the arithmetic about their own repo. The current box does their thinking for them — this is where "marketing" creeps in.

Candidate restraint laws

Pick any subset; each is enforceable at build time (a grep, not a vibe). They compose with the ratified laws (density, dev-speak, first-contact, lowered article).

L1
Word budgets.

Hero subline ≤ 16 words · section lede ≤ 24 · edge note ≤ 18. The build fails on overage, like the register greps do. Succinct becomes a property of the site, not a mood of the writer.

L2
Fences once.

A label (PROVISIONAL) may appear everywhere; its explanation appears exactly once per site, on the Method/research page. Everything else links.

L3
Teach nothing on the surface.

No term is defined where it is used — coined words link to the Method. The reader who wants school clicks; the reader who doesn't was never lectured. The run teaches the Examen; the page doesn't.

L4
Command before prose.

On instrument surfaces the command appears within the first two lines; explanation follows it. How-to order, man-page order.

L5
The fold carries three things.

One claim, one number, one action — nothing else above the fold on any landing. (The 50ms judgment is aesthetic; the 5-second one is "what do I do here.")

L6
End early.

No editorial after a number — the "read it plainly" boxes go, site-wide. Numbers with receipts, then silence. The space is the persuasion.

L7
The em-dash ration.

One per sentence, maximum. Some sentences ship unqualified.

reply with picks like "A for instruments, C for the door, L2 L3 L6" — applied site-wide in one pass, then redeployed for your eyes